Neu gelesen:

Neil Gaiman, The View from the Cheap Seats

Das Buch wäre als E-Book sicherlich leichter zu handhaben gewesen, aber letztendlich bin ich doch froh ein gedrucktes Exemplar zu haben, auch wenn die Taschenbuchausgabe sich allein vom Gewicht her schon ziemlich nah an der Grenze des handlichen bewegt. Die Entscheidung zwischen dem UK- und dem US-Cover fiel auch nicht gerade leicht. Schwierig war auch die Lektüre, hauptsächlich weil fast alle gesammelten Nonfiction-Texte in diesem Buch relativ kurz sind und als Einleitung, Vorwort, Nachwort, Besprechung, Artikel, Interview etc., u.ä., u.v.a. fast alle andere Bücher oder Werke behandeln, vorstellen, empfehlen und beschreiben, so dass man am Ende von der geballten Wucht der Sammlung schier erschlagen wird. Ich habe mir mindestens ein Dutzend Mal die Seite markiert, wo Gaiman dem Leser ein Werk ans Herz legt das mich jetzt auch interessiert, und ich denke, dass ich einigen davon auch tatsächlich folgen werde, sobald es mein Budget und die Zeit zulässt. Hoffe ich zumindest.

I doubt I am the only person who writes letters in his head he never sends. In my head I wrote many pages in reply, and then I never wrote it down or sent it.
In truth, Kipling's politics are not mine. But then, it would be a poor sort of world if one were only able to read authors who expressed points of view that one agreed with entirely. It would be a bland sort of world if we could not spend time with people who thought differently, and who saw the world from a different place. Kipling was many things that I am not and I like that in my authors.
(aus: Introduction to Rudyard Kipling's Tales of Horror and Fantasy, 2008)
.
.
I don't think there is such a thing as a bad book for children. Every now and again it becomes fashionable among some adults to point at a subset of children's books, a genre, perhaps, or an author, and to declare them bad books, books that children should be stopped from reading. I've seen it happen over and over; Enid Blyton was declared a bad author, so was R.L. Stine, so were dozens of others. Comics have been decried as fostering illiteracy.
It's tosh. It's snobbery and it's foolishness.
There are no bad authors for children, that children like and want to read and seek out, because every child is different. They can find the stories they need to, and they bring themselves to stories. A hackneyed, worn out idea isn't hackneyed and worn out to someone encountering it for the first time. You don't discourage children from reading because you feel they are reading the wrong thing. Fiction you do not like is the gateway drug to other books you may prefer them to read. And not everyone has the same taste as you.
Well-meaning adults can easily destroy a child's love of reading: stop them reading what they enjoy, or give them worthy-but-dull books that you like, the twenty-first-century equivalents of Victorian "improving" literature. You'll wind up with a generation convinced that reading is uncool and, worse, unpleasant.
(aus: Why our Future depends on Libraries, Reading and Daydreaming: The Reading Agency lecture, 2013)

(Neil Gaiman, The View from the Cheap Seats, 2016)